RSS

sultan kinish with more logic to free the mind, read it or stay shtooopid

14 Apr

The Unexpected Snake

The Farmer and the Snake

A Farmer walked through his field one cold winter morning. On the ground lay a Snake, stiff and frozen with the cold. The Farmer knew how deadly the Snake could be, and yet he picked it up and put it in his bosom to warm it back to life.

The Snake soon revived, and when it had enough strength, bit the man who had been so kind to it. The bite was deadly and the Farmer felt that he must die. “Oh,” cried the Farmer with his last breath, “I am rightly served for pitying a scoundrel.”

The Greatest Kindness Will Not Bind the Ungrateful.

The moral of this commonsense fable of Aesop’s from a mere 2500 years ago is that doing good to evil will only result in more evil. Aiding those who kill only brings more death, not life. It is human nature to think that people will return good for good and evil for evil. This kind of thinking perversely leads some to assume that if they are being treated evilly, then they must have done something evil to deserve it. This logic is routinely used by the left to argue that Islamic terrorists are simply paying us back in the same coin.

However the problem with assuming that good is repaid for good, and evil for evil, is that it presumes that all peoples, all cultures, all ideologies and religions are equivalent. That they all react in the same way and with the same motives, treating others as they are treated. It furthermore assumes that evil exists because evil has been done to someone else.

In September 1 1939, W.H Auden responded to Hitler’s invasion of Poland by penning the lines;

Those to whom evil is done / Do evil in return

Since then those same lines have been routinely taken up by liberals eager to pen their own apologetics for evil. In the wake of another early September, September 11th, Auden’s poem was re-embraced once again by liberals penning essays explaining why we were the real terrorists.

But while it is easy enough to dismiss W.H. Auden as naive, snakes don’t always look the way you expect them to. Particularly snakes who take refuge in the mind of man. Auden was more snake than farmer and his words were the snake-words of one scaly creature excusing the evil of another.

Auden you see was a Communist. And in September 1939, the USSR and Nazi Germany had an agreement. An agreement to carve up Poland. And W.H. Auden was no pacifist. The man who two years earlier had penned the line, “The consious acceptance of guilt in the necessary murder” in his poem Spain, when referring to the Soviet atrocities in Spain, was not a pacifist. He was one of the snakes.

Advertisements
 
Leave a comment

Posted by on April 14, 2010 in Uncategorized

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: